The series „Vikings" brought the Viking Age to a whole generation – and along the way it compressed, condensed and invented a great deal. Ragnar and Rollo as brothers, a single hero who conquers Paris, a place called „Kattegat": that is gripping television, but not a history lesson. The good news: beneath the drama lies a real core, and it is often more exciting than the fiction. We separate the two cleanly – without spoiling the show.
A series has to entertain, not to prove. „Vikings" takes the liberty of pressing roughly a century and a half of history into a single heroic life and turning loosely attested saga figures into solid characters. That is fair enough – as long as you know what is script and what is source.
We go through the best-known claims one by one: the hero Ragnar, his „brother" Rollo, the warrior Lagertha, the monk Athelstan, the setting „Kattegat" and the notorious blood eagle. At the end comes the point where the series gets closest to history – with Ragnar's sons.
Ragnar Lodbrok is not a clearly identifiable historical person but a legendary composite figure. His material survives above all in the Icelandic „Ragnars saga loðbrókar" and in the Danish chronicler Saxo Grammaticus – texts written centuries after the supposed lifetime. In them the deeds and names of several leaders are bundled into a single superhuman hero.
The series turns this into one farmer who rises to king and conqueror of Paris. Historically it is his sons (more on that later) who are tangible, rather than the father himself. Ragnar is thus less a man than an echo – the condensed reverberation of the whole early Viking Age.
This also explains why the accounts of Ragnar are so contradictory: in one version he dies in a snake pit of the Northumbrian king Ælla, in another somewhere entirely different. A hero whose death is told in several versions and whose deeds are spread across generations is not a record – he is legend. That is exactly what makes him so rewarding to tell and so hard to pin down historically.
Perhaps the series' greatest liberty: Rollo as Ragnar's jealous brother. Almost nothing about this is historically true. The real Rollo lived about a century later and, according to the sources, has nothing to do with Ragnar. He became famous through the Treaty of Saint-Clair-sur-Epte in 911: the West Frankish king Charles the Simple granted the Viking leader the land around Rouen, Rollo was baptised (taking the name Robert) – and out of that territory grew Normandy.
The series shows Ragnar and Rollo together at the siege of Paris. In reality Paris was besieged roughly twenty years after Ragnar's supposed death (the great siege of 885/886). Rollo's descendants, in turn, lead all the way down to William the Conqueror and thus into the English royal house – a line impressive enough without making him Ragnar's brother.
It is also worth noting how the treaty came about: Rollo had besieged the town of Chartres in 911 and been defeated; granting him land was, for the Frankish king, a way to turn a dangerous enemy into a border guard against other Vikings. The raider became a duke – the beginning of one of the most consequential dynasties in Europe. That the series pins this story onto Ragnar is understandable dramatically, but it blurs an entire century.
Lagertha is one of the series' strongest characters – and a delicate case for the sources. Her only written attestation is the Danish chronicler Saxo Grammaticus, who around 1200 tells in his „Gesta Danorum" of a warrior named Ladgerda. This is a literary text, written some three hundred years after the events it claims.
Ladgerda, a skilled amazon, who, though a maiden, had the courage of a man, and fought in front among the bravest with her hair loose over her shoulders. All marvelled at her matchless deeds, for her locks flying down her back betrayed that she was a woman.Saxo Grammaticus, Gesta Danorum, Book IX; public-domain translation by O. Elton 1894
Whether „the shieldmaiden" really existed as a widespread warrior role is disputed in scholarship. An often-cited clue is the warrior grave Bj 581 at Birka, whose occupant was genetically determined to be female in 2017 – a significant single find, but no proof of whole armies of women. What is certain: Lagertha is thinly attested historically, yet genuinely old as a saga figure.
That women played an active, often independent role in the Viking Age is not in doubt: they ran farms, carried keys as a sign of household authority, could inherit and could divorce. Whether they regularly went into battle is another question. The series turns a rare, disputed motif into a norm – for good dramatic reasons, but with an eye to effect rather than to the state of the sources.
The likeable monk Athelstan, torn between Christianity and Norse belief, is one of the series' emotional anchors – and entirely invented. No source knows such a companion of Ragnar. The character is a dramatic device to show the clash of cultures from the inside.
That is clever storytelling, but it is script. The real contact between Vikings and the Christian world ran differently: through trade, raiding, missionaries and treaties – not through a single cloister brother at a chieftain's fire. The cultural clash was real; Athelstan as a person was not.
Still, the character captures a real phenomenon: the gradual Christianisation of the North, which stretched over centuries and by no means proceeded only by the sword. Traders, hostages and missionaries carried the new faith into Scandinavia, for a time often alongside the old cult rather than immediately in its place. Athelstan is the dramatic sharpening of a long, many-layered process.
In the series „Kattegat" is Ragnar's home town, a trading harbour in Norway. In reality the Kattegat is not a place at all but a strait – the body of water between the Jutland peninsula (Denmark) and Sweden that links the North Sea and the Baltic.
The set itself, incidentally, was built in Ireland and combined with footage from Norwegian fjords. A stretch of sea thus becomes a town – a small but typical case of how the series freely turns geographical names into settings. Anyone looking for „Kattegat" on a historical map finds water, not a harbour town.
Few scenes of the series are as notorious as the „blood eagle", a gruesome execution. Whether this rite was ever actually carried out is highly disputed in scholarship. The Old Norse scholar Roberta Frank argued convincingly in 1984 that the later saga descriptions probably rest on a misunderstanding of poetic imagery.
Skaldic verse liked to describe fallen enemies so that the eagle feasts on their corpses – a common image for death in battle, with birds of prey tearing at the dead who lie face down. Out of this kenning, Frank argues, later authors gradually shaped a full-blown ritual of torture. As a secure historical practice the blood eagle cannot be attested at all – it is literary shudder rather than recorded custom.
That does not mean the Viking Age was squeamish – war, raiding and executions were real and often brutal. It is only the blood eagle as an elaborate ritual that belongs more to the world of the late storytellers than to that of the perpetrators. A good example of how a poetic image can, over centuries, turn into a supposed custom.
Remarkably, the sons are more firmly attested than the father. In 865 a Great Heathen Army invaded England, led according to the sources by men reckoned as sons of Ragnar – among them Ivar the Boneless, Halfdan and Ubba. In 866 they took York; in 869 the East Anglian king Edmund fell. Ivar is linked by part of the scholarship with the „Ímar" of Dublin named in the Irish annals.
Within a few years these campaigns turned into real rule: the Great Army conquered large parts of eastern England and founded the so-called Danelaw, the region where Norse law and language long echoed on. Place names ending in -by and -thorpe still recall it. Where the series shows individual heroes, there were in truth whole armies, treaties and lasting settlements.
Here the series touches real history – condensed and embellished, but real. Anyone who wants to dig deeper will find our own fact-checks on Ragnar Lodbrok, on Ragnar's sons and on the shieldmaiden Lagertha. In short: „Vikings" is a drama, not a history book – but a drama that makes you want to read the real tradition. And that tradition more than holds its own.
Ragnar Lodbrok is a legendary composite figure (Ragnars saga, Saxo Grammaticus). Rollo lived about a century after Ragnar and in 911 received the land around Rouen in the Treaty of Saint-Clair-sur-Epte (baptised as Robert). Lagertha appears only in Saxo (Gesta Danorum IX, c. 1200). In 865 the Great Army invaded England, led by men reckoned as sons of Ragnar (Ivar, Halfdan, Ubba); York 866, Edmund of East Anglia 869.
Rollo as Ragnar's brother, the monk Athelstan as a companion and „Kattegat" as a home town are invented; the Kattegat is a strait. Roughly a century and a half is pressed into one life (Paris was besieged only ~20 years after Ragnar's supposed death). The blood eagle is regarded as a literary misreading of a skaldic kenning (Roberta Frank, 1984), not a secure practice.
Ragnar Lodbrok · Lagertha the Shield-Maiden · Ragnar's sons · Marvel's Thor fact-check · Typically Viking?.
Few images from the Viking Age are as disturbing as the „blood eagle": a ritual killing in which the victim's ribs were …
Read more →To some an ancient Germanic sun-sanctuary, to others a Christian place of pilgrimage – the Externsteine in the …
Read more →When thick flakes fall, people in many regions still say: „Frau Holle is shaking her beds." A harmless children’s …
Read more →Friday – the finest working day carries a goddess’s name. But whose? Some swear by Freya, others by Frigg. The answer …
Read more →