Yes, the Germanic peoples had priests – but not a closed priestly caste like the Celtic druids. Tacitus describes a tribal priest who read the lots and alone could punish warriors, the Goths called such a man gudja, and in Scandinavia cult leaders were known as goði or gyðja. Often they were the very people who also controlled land, law and retinue: chieftains, earls and kings. Beside them stood specialists like Veleda or the wandering völva. Here is what the sources and runestones actually tell us.
Picture an assembly somewhere between the Rhine and the Elbe in the first century AD. A white cloth lies on the ground. A man cuts twigs from a fruit-bearing tree, marks them, scatters them, looks to the sky, prays, and picks up three, one at a time. Then he speaks – and the whole tribe listens. According to Tacitus, this is the sacerdos civitatis, the priest of the tribe.
Temple complexes with priestly quarters and high priests, on the other hand, you will look for in vain. The evidence is scattered over a thousand years, from Roman ethnographers to Icelandic sagas of the thirteenth century. Keep those layers apart and a clear picture emerges: religious offices, yes; a separate priestly class, probably not.
For an overview of the gods, groves and forms of worship, see our article on Germanic religion. This one is about the people who held the cult in their hands.
The oldest statement on the subject is also the most awkward. Writing around 50 BC in the sixth book of his Gallic War (6.21), Julius Caesar claims that the Germani have no druids to preside over divine matters and take no interest in sacrifice. They worship only what they can see and what plainly benefits them: the sun, fire and the moon.
Just before this, Caesar has described the Gaulish druids (6.13–14): a learned elite exempt from military service and taxes, with long oral training and a single head. His Germanic excursus is built as a mirror image – handy for his story of the Rhine as the frontier between peoples Rome can govern and peoples it cannot.
Caesar also contradicts himself. In book one (1.50) he reports that in Ariovistus' army the matrons decided by lots and prophecy whether battle was advisable – and declared that the Germani could not win if they fought before the new moon. Religious interpretation with immediate military consequences is the opposite of "no interest in cult". The true core of 6.21 is probably narrower: the Germanic peoples had no supra-regional priesthood on the Gaulish model. That fits everything that follows.
In AD 98 Tacitus published his Germania. He never visited the region himself, but drew on older works and reports – and he mentions priests with remarkably concrete duties.
The best-known example comes in chapter ten, on the lot oracle. When the community seeks guidance, the sacerdos civitatis acts; in private matters, the head of the household himself. That clause shows two things: there was a public office, and yet religious action was not exclusive. In his own house, every head of family was his own priest.
At the horse oracle, the priest and the king or leading man walk beside white horses never used for work and read their neighing. The priests, Tacitus says, regard themselves as servants of the gods, but the horses as the gods' confidants. The priest stands beside the oracle, not above it – and shares the task with the political leader. More in our post on Germanic oracles.
Even more surprising is what Tacitus says about the army in chapter seven. War leaders, he writes, lead by example rather than by command. Only the priests are permitted to execute, to bind, or even to flog – and not as punishment or on the leader's orders, but as if at the command of the god whom they believe stands beside them in battle. They also carry images and emblems taken from the sacred groves into the fight.
Chapter eleven, on the popular assembly, the Thing, points the same way. When the crowd has sat down under arms, the priests command silence – and at that moment, Tacitus says, they also have the right to coerce (coercendi ius). Then the king or the chiefs speak, with the power of persuasion rather than command. The priests protect the frame within which politics happens: the sacred peace of the assembly. For what such meeting places looked like on the ground, see our piece on Bällsta and Anundshög.
In chapter forty Tacitus describes the cult of Nerthus, shared by seven tribes on the Baltic. On an island, in a sacred grove, stands a covered wagon that only one priest may touch. He perceives when the goddess is present and escorts the cow-drawn wagon through the land; while she travels, weapons are put away. Afterwards everything is washed in a hidden lake, and the slaves who helped are swallowed by it. Here we meet a specialist with exclusive access to one place and one deity.
Stranger still is the note in chapter forty-three. Among the Naharvali in eastern Germania a grove of ancient religion is shown. A priest in women's dress (sacerdos muliebri ornatu) presides over it, and the gods worshipped there are divine brothers whom Tacitus compares to Castor and Pollux and who are called the Alcis. What "women's dress" means exactly is open. Some scholars think of long, loose hair; others of ritual gender crossing. Either way, the detail fits no Roman cliché.
A late but valuable addition comes from Ammianus Marcellinus in the fourth century (28.5.14), writing about the Burgundians. Their king, he says, is called by the general title hendinos and, by ancient custom, is deposed if the fortune of war wavers or the earth yields too little. The chief priest, by contrast, is called sinistus, holds his power for life and faces no such dangers. For once, a high priest with his own title, more secure in office than the king. The name is usually explained as "the eldest" (compare Gothic sinista, "eldest").
When Roman authors marvel at Germanic religion, it is mostly at women. Strabo (7.2.3) describes the seeresses of the Cimbri: grey-haired priestesses in white, barefoot, who cut prisoners' throats over a bronze cauldron and read the future from the blood. Eyewitness report or second-hand horror story? We cannot tell.
In the Germania (8), Tacitus writes that the Germani believe there is something holy and far-seeing in women, and so they do not scorn their advice. Under Vespasian many regarded Veleda as a divine being, and earlier they had revered an Aurinia – a name many editors emend to Albruna.
Tacitus says more about Veleda in his Histories (4.61 and 4.65). She belonged to the Bructeri and lived in a tower near the river Lippe. No one was allowed to see her; a kinsman carried questions in and answers out like a god's messenger. In the Batavian revolt of AD 69/70 she had foretold a Germanic victory, and later the rebels even towed a captured Roman flagship up the Lippe as a gift for her (Histories 5.22).
Finally, Cassius Dio (67.5.3) reports that under Domitian, Masyos, king of the Semnones, and Ganna, a virgin who served as seeress after Veleda, travelled to the emperor and were received with honour. A seeress as diplomatic companion to a king – that says a great deal about her rank.
The difference from the tribal priest matters: in no account does Veleda sacrifice. Her power rests on prophecy and charisma – authority, not office.
Language offers a second route in, independent of Roman eyes. When Bishop Wulfila translated the Bible into Gothic in the fourth century, he needed a word for the Jewish priest, Greek hiereús. He chose gudja. The high priest became auhumists gudja, literally "highest priest", and the priesthood gudjinassus. The word derives from guþ, "god", and means something like "the one who belongs to, or deals with, the god". That Wulfila did not borrow a Greek term suggests the Goths had their own, readily understood word for cult personnel.
The same word appears – about a century later – on a stone in western Norway. The Nordhuglo runestone, from the island of Huglo in Stord municipality, dates from the Migration Period and bears an inscription in the Elder Futhark that opens ek gudija: "I, the priest". What follows is disputed. It is often read as ungandiR and explained as "immune to sorcery"; others see a personal name, or read the damaged signs differently. Only the self-designation is secure: someone called himself gudija in stone, at a time from which the North has left us hardly any writing at all.
In Old Norse the word becomes goði, feminine gyðja. In Old High German, by contrast, the priest was the êwart or êwarto, "guardian of the law" (from êwa, "law, custom, order"). Priesthood and law-keeping lay close together – just as in Tacitus, where priests guard the peace of the Thing.
The earliest instances of the word goði come not from Iceland but from Denmark. The Glavendrup stone on Funen, early tenth century, belongs to a large ship setting. Ragnhildr raised it for Alli the Pale, whom she calls goða vés – "goði of the sanctuary" – and an honourable thegn of the retinue. The carver also invokes Thor to hallow the runes. Two further stones on Funen, Helnæs and Flemløse, name a Hróðulfr with the title goði, linked to an obscure name that probably refers to a group of people or a place.
A little older is the Snoldelev stone on Zealand, ninth century: "Gunnvaldr's stone, son of Hróaldr, þulr at Salhaugar." The word þulr is related to þylja, "to recite solemnly". Hávamál (stanza 111) speaks of "the þulr's chair" from which wisdom is proclaimed, and in Beowulf, Unferth, the speaker at the Danish court, bears the related title þyle. Cult speaker, law-keeper or poet? The sources do not let us decide – but it was a recognised office tied to a place.
The goði is best documented in Iceland, and there it quickly becomes clear why the word should not simply be translated as "priest". After the settlement began around 870, a commonwealth arose without a king. Its pillars were the goðar. A goði held a goðorð, a chieftaincy treated in law much like property: it could be inherited, split, given away, sold or lent. Under the arrangement that Íslendingabók describes for the years around 965 there were 36 old chieftaincies, then 39 thanks to a special rule for the Northern Quarter. Free farmers, the thingmen, attached themselves to a goði – and could switch to another.
A goði's duties were above all political and legal. He appointed judges, sat in the law council (Lögrétta) at the Althing, represented his followers in court and held the spring assembly of his district. And originally he had cult duties too. One version of Landnámabók preserves the rules attributed to the lawspeaker Úlfljótr: in every principal temple a ring of at least two ounces should lie on the altar, and the goði was to wear it on his arm at every assembly, after reddening it in the blood of an animal he had sacrificed himself. Anyone with business before the court swore on that ring, calling on Freyr, Njörðr and "the almighty áss". Every farmer was also to pay a temple toll (hoftollr) to the goði.
The passage is precious, but it is no eyewitness account. Christian scholars wrote it down in the twelfth or thirteenth century, and the temple toll looks suspiciously like a back-projection of the tithe, introduced in Iceland in 1097. Archaeology knows no dedicated temple buildings in Iceland, but it does know feasting halls such as Hofstaðir near Mývatn, where cattle skulls point to repeated sacrificial meals. More in our article on blót sites.
When Iceland accepted Christianity in the year 1000, the goðar did not disappear. Their office lost its cult side and lived on as a political institution until Iceland came under the Norwegian crown in 1262–64. The heart of the office lay in power, not in sacrifice.
And the gyðja? The feminine counterpart is securely attested as a word in Old Norse, including the compound hofgyðja, "temple priestess". But the instances are few and come from late saga literature. They do not tell us whether women regularly led public sacrifices. It is plausible that the lady of the house took on cult duties at private feasts – just as Tacitus names the father of the family for the household lot oracle.
At the top of society, the great cult was led by the ruler. The most famous scene is in Snorri Sturluson's Heimskringla (c. 1230), in the saga of Hákon the Good. Hákon, son of Harald Fairhair, had been raised a Christian at the court of King Æthelstan of England and ruled Norway from roughly 934 to 961. His farmers in Trøndelag nonetheless expected him to take his seat at the great winter sacrifice at Hlaðir (Lade).
Snorri describes the feast in detail: horses and other livestock were slaughtered, the blood (hlaut) sprinkled with twigs over altars, walls and people, the meat boiled and eaten. The host blessed the cup and the meat. The first toast was to Odin for victory and royal power, then to Njörðr and Freyr for a good year and peace (til árs ok friðar). The feast was hosted by Sigurðr, earl of Hlaðir, who held the sacrifices on the king's behalf. For what such sacrifices look like archaeologically, see our article on Germanic sacrifice and sanctuaries.
Hákon tried a trick: he made the sign of the cross over the cup. Sigurðr calmed the grumbling farmers – the king, he said, had made the sign of Thor's hammer. At the next feast, at Mære, that did not work twice; the farmers pressed him until he ate a few bites of horse liver. The story was written down by a Christian Icelander some 250 years later, so details such as the order of toasts should not be taken at face value. Its core fits everything else: the king was the guarantor of the sacrifice. If he refused, he endangered harvest, peace and his own rule.
Adam of Bremen seems to offer a counter-example. Around 1075 (book 4, chapters 26–27) he describes the temple at Uppsala with images of Thor, Wodan and Fricco: for all their gods, he says, the Swedes had appointed priests to offer the people's sacrifices. But Adam never went there; he relied on reports, and he wrote as a historian of mission for whom a proper cult needed priests. Whether these were independent specialists or local leaders with cult duties remains open.
A glance at England: Bede (Ecclesiastical History 2.13) tells of Coifi, chief priest of King Edwin of Northumbria, who converted in 627. A pagan priest, says Bede, could not carry weapons or ride anything but a mare. So Coifi took weapons and a stallion, rode to the sanctuary at Goodmanham and hurled a spear into it. The source is Christian, but the taboos are too specific to be pure invention.
Next to the office-holders, the North knew an entirely different figure: the völva, the seeress with the staff. The fullest description is in the Saga of Erik the Red (ch. 4, thirteenth century). In a famine winter in Greenland a farmer invites the seeress Þorbjörg. She wears a blue cloak, a lambskin hood lined with catskin and carries a staff with a brass knob; she sits on a raised seat while a young woman sings the songs that summon the spirits. Then Þorbjörg foretells the end of the hardship.
The völva leads no communal sacrifice and keeps no sanctuary. She travels from farm to farm, is invited and feasted, and answers questions. Her art is seiðr, a form of sorcery and divination closely tied in the sources to Freyja and Odin. In that sense she stands in the tradition of the seeresses Tacitus already knew – a personal authority, not an office-holder. Whether there really is a line from Veleda to Þorbjörg is, however, a reconstruction: almost a thousand years and very different societies lie between them.
Archaeology offers hints: several Viking Age women's graves contained metal staffs that scholars such as Neil Price read as possible seeresses' staffs, and grave 4 at the Fyrkat ring fortress held a woman with henbane seeds in a pouch. No find can prove these women were völur.
Lay the evidence side by side and a clear pattern appears. On the Continent, Tacitus knows priests with fixed duties, the Burgundians a chief priest for life, the Goths their own word, the Anglo-Saxons a court priest bound by taboos. For some peoples of the earlier period, a specialised cult office is well attested.
In the Viking Age North, religious and secular leadership merge. Historians of religion such as Olof Sundqvist and Gro Steinsland stress that cult leadership was tied to social position: the householder sacrificed on the farm, the goði in his district, the earl or king at the great feasts. Alongside them were specialists like the þulr or the völva. A closed priestly class with power of its own beside the chieftains cannot be demonstrated for Scandinavia, and most scholars consider it unlikely.
That is not a deficiency but a different logic: Germanic religion was not a church with doctrines but a practice bound up with farm, kin, assembly and lordship. That is why even a Christian king like Hákon had to swallow a few bites of horse liver.
In our workshop in Alsdorf we meet this complexity whenever customers ask for a "genuine goði rune" or a "priest symbol". The honest answer: there is no such thing. What exists are names, titles and inscriptions – Alli on his stone, Gunnvaldr son of Hróaldr, and a nameless gudija on a Norwegian island. That is less mysterious than an invented order, but far more beautiful, because it is true.
Did the Germanic peoples have priests? Yes. Tacitus mentions priests who read lots, alone could punish warriors and tended sanctuaries, and the Goths had their own word for them, gudja. But there was no closed, supra-regional priestly order like the Celtic druids.
What is a goði? In the Viking Age North a goði was a chieftain with cult and legal duties. In Iceland the goðorð was a political office that could be inherited, bought and sold, and it survived the conversion as a secular institution.
Were there Norse or Germanic priestesses? The word gyðja is attested, and seeresses such as Veleda, Ganna or the völva wielded great influence. Evidence for women leading public sacrifices is rare and late, though women probably had cult duties in the household.
Were druids Germanic? No. Druids were the priestly and learned class of the Celts in Gaul and Britain. Caesar explicitly states that the Germani had no druids.
Who led a Viking blót? Usually the host: the householder on the farm, the goði in the district, the earl or king at the great feasts. Snorri describes how Hákon the Good, a Christian king, was pressed into the sacrificial feasts at Lade and Mære.
For courage. For remembrance. For legends that live on.
Veleda · Germanic Religion · The grove of the Semnones · Nerthus – the earth goddess · The Nahanarvali.
All Festivals & Belief articles →
While elsewhere a round man with a reindeer sleigh rolls in, in Iceland thirteen troll boys come down from the …
Read more →A fire in the open, a drinking horn passed from hand to hand, a few words to gods and ancestors, and at the end a …
Read more →A life has its great thresholds: the arrival of a child, the coming-together of two people, the farewell to a loved …
Read more →