Birth, marriage, death: for these three thresholds the Old Norse sources know customs but no ritual book. There is water poured over a newborn and the name-gift, a hammer in a bride's lap and a handshake, the pyre and the memorial stone by the road. We read the evidence piece by piece, test how old and how secure it is, and separate it from what today's pagan communities have made of it.
First the uncomfortable truth: there is no Old Norse description of a wedding "according to pagan rite", no handed-down sequence for a naming, and no funeral ritual written by an initiate. What we have are scenes in sagas, stanzas in the Edda, legal provisions from Iceland and Norway, an eyewitness report by an Arab, and finds from graves. The sagas were mostly written down in the thirteenth century, the Edda manuscripts date from the same time, the laws from the twelfth and thirteenth. Everything pagan reaches us through Christian hands.
That is no reason for resignation, but it is a reason for precision. In this piece we work with three levels: attested (several times, from different kinds of source), reported (once, or only in late literature) and newly designed (present-day practice). Anyone who marks life's thresholds today on a Norse model mostly moves on the third level, with borrowings from the first two. That is legitimate as long as one knows it.
At the start of life stand powers that decide fate. The norns appear at birth in the Edda: in the first Helgi lay, Helgakviða Hundingsbana I, they come in the night the hero is born and spin his destiny. That is a poet's image, not a custom, but it shows that a newborn's fate was thought of as already spun. In the same line stands the idea of the fylgja and hamingja, the accompanying being and the personal luck that could be passed on within a family.
According to the sagas a child was not automatically a member of the family. The tradition knows an act of acceptance: the newborn was laid on the floor and stayed there until the father lifted him up. In Ragnars saga loðbrókar (ch. 8 in the numbering of the overview named below) the boy is placed in the fold of Ragnar's cloak. A second form of acceptance is setting on the knee: Fagrskinna knows it, and the sagas tell how an envoy of King Harald Fairhair used it to trick the English king Æthelstan into taking young Hákon as a foster son, hence Hákon's byname Aðalsteinsfóstri. These examples come from thirteenth-century sagas and in part carry legendary features. How widespread such rituals were in everyday life, we do not know.
One more uncomfortable point the sources do not conceal: the exposure of children, útburðr. It depended mainly on the father's will, unacknowledged children were called úborin, and the sagas give deformity, poverty, marital discord or omens as reasons. When Iceland adopted Christianity around the year 1000, according to Íslendingabók (ch. 7) exposure was allowed to continue for a transitional period, alongside the eating of horse meat. This belongs to the picture too: the threshold of birth was not only a celebration but also a decision.
The best-known birth custom is the pouring of water, Old Norse ausa vatni. The dictionary by Cleasby and Vigfússon (1874) calls it "a standing phrase for a sort of baptism used in the last centuries, at least, of the heathen age": the child was sprinkled with water and given its name without any priest being necessary. Attestations are named in Heimskringla (Haralds saga hárfagra), Egils saga, Eyrbyggja saga, Hervarar saga, Landnámabók and others; the chapter numbering in the overview we rely on (voluspa.org) differs between editions, so anyone who wants to cite precisely should check the primary text. According to that compilation, killing a child after it had been sprinkled counted as murder.
The Hávamál are often brought in here, and stanza 158 appears in the dictionary and in the literature as an early mention. A close look pays off:
"The thirteenth I know: if I am to sprinkle a young warrior with water, he shall not fall, even when he goes into the host; he does not sink before swords."Hávamál 158 (our own rendering from the Old Norse text; context: Ljóðatal, the thirteenth charm)
The stanza belongs to the Ljóðatal, the series of charms that Odin lists. It speaks of a þegn ungan, a young retainer, not an infant, and it names no name. It is a protective spell. A link to the water rite for newborns is an interpretation, not a statement of the text. It is plausible, since water, consecration and protection belong together, but it is not secure.
How old the custom is also remains open. The sources are transmitted by Christians; Cleasby and Vigfússon already consider it heathen, yet the question whether the Christian baptismal rite may have had a hand as a model cannot be decided with certainty from texts that Christians passed down. Anyone who welcomes a child with water today can therefore appeal to an attested tradition, but should not speak of "primeval".
The sprinkling with water and the naming (ausa vatni) are attested in several sagas and described in the Cleasby–Vigfússon dictionary (1874) as a heathen custom of the late period. That the name-giver made a gift, the nafnfesti, is likewise attested in sagas. Hávamál 158 mentions water, but in the setting of a protective spell for a young man, not a naming ceremony.
With the name a child entered the community. Names were often given after relatives or friends, and people believed that the name-giver's luck could pass to the child. In Vatnsdœla saga the grandfather says of his grandson that he expects him to be lucky because of his name. Names of gods were also held to protect; an example is the many names with Þór- in the Icelandic sources, as our piece on Viking names shows. A selection of names with a Norse root is in the Nordic first names.
Whoever gave the name added a gift: the nafnfesti, literally the "name-fastening". The sagas mention rings, weapons, farms or land. In Ragnars saga a boy receives a gold ring, in Óláfs saga Tryggvasonar (ch. 90 in the overview mentioned) a sword, later the scabbard to go with it. The gift made the name binding and the event visible. With a ring that is a telling detail: rings stood in the North for bonds and rank, more at oath rings.
This very idea of giving an object to the moment is what present-day communities continue. That it is a keepsake and not a valuable comes close to the tradition: the name-gift was never just decoration, it was a sign that something had become valid. Anyone looking for a gift for a birth or naming finds in this thought a documentable point of connection.
"The naming ceremony is an ancient Germanic rite with a fixed sequence." What is attested is a bundle of single acts: acceptance by the father, water-sprinkling, name-giving, gift. A uniform sequence with spoken formulas, invocations or a priest is not handed down. The German term "Namensweihe" is itself a modern coinage. That today's groups shape a celebration from this is their creative achievement, and it should be told exactly that way.
In the North marriage was first a matter between two families. The Icelandic laws collected in the Grágás regulate betrothal, bride-price (mundr) and dowry (heimanfylgja) at length, and the wedding feast, brúðlaup, confirmed before witnesses what the families had agreed. Anyone who wants the details will find them in the translation Laws of Early Iceland by Dennis, Foote and Perkins (1980). The handshake, Old Norse handsal, was a common means of sealing contracts; it belongs to the world of law as much as to that of weddings.
The ring that wedding engraving often takes up today has a history of its own. In Eyrbyggja saga (ch. 4) a silver ring lies on the altar in the temple, and oaths are sworn on it. That was a legal ritual, not a wedding ring. Wedding rings in today's sense are a later development. One may say: the ring as a symbol of binding is attested in the North, the wedding ring as an obligation is not.
About the goddess Vár we know little, but the little is revealing. Snorri writes in Gylfaginning that she hears the oaths and agreements between women and men and punishes those who break them; such agreements are called várar. She also appears in name lists in Skáldskaparmál, in a kenning and in a runic inscription from Bergen around 1300. Scholarship is cautious: Andy Orchard calls the antiquity of the marriage ritual "far from clear", Britt-Mari Näsström suspects Vár was originally a name of Freyja, and Rudolf Simek ranks her among the minor protective goddesses of the household. As with many minor figures, that is a thin foundation for a cult.
The most famous wedding scene in Norse poetry stands in the Þrymskviða. Thor is disguised as the bride, the giants want to complete the marriage, and they bring the hammer Mjǫllnir to hallow the bride: it is laid on the "bride's" knees and the couple is wed "by the hand of Vár". At that moment Thor laughs inwardly, seizes the hammer and strikes the giants down. The scene is cited as evidence that the hammer had a consecrating function at weddings. Whether that is so remains open: the poem is a comedy, not a chronicle.
Its dating is also disputed. An older view takes the poem for a thoroughly heathen work of around 900, now a minority opinion. Jan de Vries, Peter Hallberg and others place it in the first half of the thirteenth century and read it as a Christian-era parody of the gods. Anyone who wants to read it as a source for a real wedding consecration must therefore assume that the poet parodied a custom still known in his day. That is conceivable, not proven. The bronze figure from Eyrarland in Iceland, a Thor from around the year 1000, may show the god gripping the hammer with both hands, perhaps in exactly this scene. That too remains an interpretation.
How does this relate to the Thor's hammer as jewellery? Hammer rings and hammer pendants have been found in Viking Age graves; their meaning as signs of consecration and protection is a hypothesis that fits the written images. A fuller discussion is in the piece named.
"Handfasting is the old Germanic wedding rite with bound hands." The word handfast is Late Old English and presumably goes back to Old Norse handfesta, but means "to strike a contract by handshake". In England from the twelfth to the seventeenth century it was a binding promise of marriage; the Marriage Act of 1753 ended the custom. The binding of hands with a cord as a "pre-Christian rite" is, according to the Wikipedia overview, which relies on Anton (1958), apparently unhistorical. It was popularised in the Wiccan and Celtic scene from at least the late 1960s; the first use in print is credited to Hans Holzer (1969). What is attested is the handshake, not the binding of hands.
For the end of life the source situation is best, because texts and finds come together. In Ynglinga saga Snorri describes the "laws of Odin": all the dead were to be burned with their possessions, the ashes scattered into the sea or buried in the earth. For men of rank a burial mound was to be raised, for other distinguished warriors a memorial stone. That is a literary back-projection, since Snorri writes some 350 years after the Viking Age, and it fits the graves only in part, where inhumations occur as well. Archaeology shows a coexistence that differs by region and period. More on grave forms in Burial in the Viking Age and on ship burial in boat burial.
The fullest eyewitness account comes from Ibn Fadlan, an Arab envoy who around 922 watched a funeral on the Volga. He describes a ship, a funeral meal, animal sacrifices and a slave girl who volunteered to follow the chieftain. The pyre was lit, and above it a mound with a post of birchwood was raised. Scholars mostly connect the group with the Scandinavian Rus but remain cautious: Ibn Fadlan spoke no Old Norse, and the report as a whole is hard to verify. It does not follow that details such as the slave girl's role were generally valid in this form.
The richly furnished grave is the other extreme. The Oseberg ship, a ninth-century burial of a woman, probably a queen or priestess, counts as the most lavish Viking burial found so far. At Birka on Lake Mälaren lies a huge cemetery that a whole community used over generations. These two examples are exceptions; most of the dead got simple graves. What a grave reveals about belief in the afterlife is a chapter of its own: Viking ideas of death, Valhalla and Helheim are each literary designs, not descriptions of graves.
From death follows a duty of the living. The Hávamál say it very plainly in stanza 72:
"A son is better, though born late, after the father has gone; seldom do memorial stones stand by the road unless kinsman raises them for kinsman."Hávamál 72 (our own rendering; bautarsteinar = memorial stones)
That is an observation and a task at once. The Viking Age left thousands of such stones. Runestones almost always carry a formula: one person "raised this stone in memory of" another, often a father, brother or companion. A famous example are the stones at Jelling, which Harald Bluetooth set for his parents Gorm and Thyra. Anyone who wants to interpret inscriptions will find introductions under picture stones and rune lore. What matters here is the idea that memory is anchored in a visible place that others can read in passing.
A second thought stands in Hávamál 76 and 77, which we render only in substance here: cattle die, kin die, you yourself will die. Only one thing never dies, the verdict on each dead person. Reputation held what the body could not. This idea shapes the North's honouring of the dead right down to names: who is remembered, lives. How the Germanic peoples honoured their dead we have summarised in a piece of its own: How the Germanic peoples honoured their dead.
Commemoration included shared drinking. At the great sacrificial feast Snorri describes for King Hákon, people drank not only the cups to the gods but also to the minni, the memory of departed friends. After Christianisation this became drinking to Christ, Mary and the saints (Krists minni). The commemoration of the dead thus became a custom that outlived the conversion, a nice example of how pre-Christian and Christian layers overlap.
What the three thresholds share is that they are public. A name not given before witnesses was one name among many; a marriage contract without witnesses carried little weight in court; a dead person without a stone was soon forgotten. The Hávamál put the attitude behind this to gift and friendship into one stanza, which we quote in Karl Simrock's German rendering (1851, public domain), here in our English version:
"With weapons and garments friends shall give each other joy … giving and giving back keep friendship longest."Hávamál 41/42, after Karl Simrock (1851), abridged; English by us
Gift and counter-gift order the relationship: whoever gives a name-gift binds himself, and whoever accepts it is bound to return. That holds for the ring at the naming as much as for the dowry, and it still holds when you do not come to a wedding empty-handed. The thought is so plain that it is easily dismissed as obvious. In the sources it is an ordering principle on which law, alliance and friendship rest.
Present-day communities pick up these elements in very different forms. In its self-description the Eldaring e. V. states explicitly that blóts take place at the festivals of the year but also at life transitions such as naming or marriage. Each blót group decides its own form; there are no ritual leaders appointed by the association. The sequence often follows the familiar pattern of opening, offering, sumbel and closing; more in How do pagans celebrate today?.
In Iceland the legal situation is different. The Ásatrúarfélagið has been recognised as a religious community since 1973, and its priests may conduct ceremonies. According to Religion News Service (2024), weddings, naming ceremonies and funerals are to take place in the Hof under construction in Reykjavík. The community says it has married same-sex couples since 2003, seven years before the state opened marriage. In Norway two pagan communities are state-recognised and may therefore perform legally valid ceremonies. How the communities relate to participants' ethnicity we have set out in our piece on Asatru today.
In Germany things are otherwise. A marriage takes legal effect only before the registry office; a celebration, pagan or otherwise, has no legal force. That is less an obstacle than a division of labour: the legal marriage takes place before the registrar, and the personal celebration is shaped independently. For death, the burial law of the federal states applies, in which the cemetery requirement plays a central role; the choice of burial form is therefore narrower than many expect. Anyone interested in a nature-close burial will find first pointers in our piece on tree burial. The responsible municipality and the burial law of the respective state give binding information.
It pays to name the gaps honestly. We do not know which words were spoken at a naming. We do not know whether there was a uniform wedding liturgy; the Þrymskviða shows a scene, but perhaps a parodied one. We know of no prayer spoken at a burial. Whether vows at the horn were usual at weddings is not attested. And about transitions later in life, such as coming of age or admission to a retinue, the sources are largely silent or tell only in literary form.
What we have is what sagas mention in passing. On this foundation something new arises. That is no flaw but the condition of every reconstruction. Keeping the line between attested and designed visible is the precondition for such celebrations to stay honest.
What links the tradition in all three cases is the wish to give a transition a lasting sign: the ring at the naming, the handshake at the marriage, the stone by the road. In our workshop we translate that into natural slate. For the wedding an engraving with names and date, for birth and naming day a welcome gift, for the farewell a plain tablet. That is our answer to the question Hávamál 72 already asks: who sets the sign? It is no more than an offer, and anyone who prefers to inscribe a stone themselves is following an older tradition than ours.
What does ausa vatni mean? Literally "to pour water". It means sprinkling a child with water at the naming, attested in several sagas and described in the Cleasby–Vigfússon dictionary as a heathen custom of the late period.
What is a name-gift? The nafnfesti, which the name-giver handed to the child, such as a ring, a weapon or land. It made the name binding and visible.
Was there a Germanic wedding ceremony with a hammer? The Þrymskviða describes how Mjǫllnir is laid in a bride's lap to wed her "by Vár's hand". Whether that reflects a real custom or a parody is debated; the poem is dated partly to around 900, partly to the thirteenth century.
Is handfasting a pagan custom? Not in the sense claimed, according to the research overview. The word originally means a contract by handshake; the binding of hands was spread in the neopagan scene from the late 1960s.
How did the Vikings bury their dead? By cremation as well as inhumation, differing by region and period. Ynglinga saga names burning with possessions, mounds for men of rank and stones for other warriors; Ibn Fadlan described a ship cremation on the Volga around 922.
Can one marry or be buried in a pagan way today? In Germany a marriage is legally valid only before the registry office, and a celebration afterwards can be shaped freely. Burials fall under state law; in Iceland and Norway recognised pagan communities may conduct legally valid ceremonies.
For courage. For remembrance. For legends that live on.
How do heathens celebrate today? · How the Germanic peoples honoured their dead · The old year's cycle up close · Norse wedding & christening gifts · Seiðr – the magic.
All Festivals & Belief articles →
There are cosier Christmas figures than a house-sized cat that prowls through the winter night to check who did not …
Read more →Before a Viking ship glided toward home, the crew took the carved dragon-heads down from the prow. Not out of modesty …
Read more →Between the years lies a time that ticks differently: the Rauhnächte, the Twelve Nights around the winter solstice. The …
Read more →Emperor Barbarossa sits in the Kyffhäuser, his head propped on the table, his beard grown through the stone slab …
Read more →